User login

You are here

Seeking Industry Feedback

***PLEASE SUBMIT RESPONSES TO THE BELOW QUESTIONS AND ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS BY JULY 31, 2014.***

 

Listed below are questions that the Government would like industry to answer in order to capture best practices and lessons learned from previous contract vehicles and solicitations, merge industry standards and solutions with OPM’s HCAAF and the principles of FSSI while achieving best value in the fields of human resource training and development and human capital management services.  

Industry is not restricted to the below questions and is permitted to ask any questions and provide any feedback for the Government to answer and consider.

 

The information provided will be utilized for preliminary planning purposes by the Government to facilitate the decision making process and will not be disclosed outside of Government. All data received that is marked or designated as corporate or proprietary information will be fully protected from release outside the Government. No reimbursement will be made for any costs associated with providing any information or any follow-up information requests. This notice does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP) or Request for Quote (RFQ) and is not to be construed as a commitment by the Government for any purpose other than market research.

Furthermore, the Government is not seeking proposals or quotes and will not accept unsolicited proposals or quotes at this time.

The Government anticipates making preliminary decisions on the acquisition strategy within the next thirty days; therefore, the Government is seeking industry feedback as soon as possible.

Responses can be sent to hrfssi@gsa.gov.

The Government is seeking the following information:

1. What suggestions does industry have to incorporate the HCAAF in the solicitation and resultant contracts? The website for the framework is: http://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/human-capital-management/#url=Framework

2. What suggestions does industry have in incorporating the FSSI in the solicitation and resultant contracts?  The website for FSSI is: https://strategicsourcing.gov/

3. Would industry prefer a Statement of Objectives (SOO) or a Statement of Work (SOW) be included in the solicitation and why?  Please provide a rationale for your preference?

4. Would industry prefer two separate contract vehicles—one for small businesses and another for large businesses—or combine both sizes into one contract vehicle?

5. The recently cancelled CHRS solicitation included ten (10) mandatory labor categories and an additional fifteen (15) labor categories industry could propose.  GSA’s Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) 738 X (Human Resources & Equal Employment Opportunity Services) does not have the same restrictions.  Would industry prefer the Government provide the labor categories and descriptions in the solicitation or allow industry to propose them?  Please provide a rationale for your preference?

6. What changes does industry recommend to the current TMA contract vehicle and recently cancelled CHRS solicitation?

7. How does industry want to be evaluated when the successor CHRS solicitation is released?  What factors and significant subfactors are relevant?  What suggestions does industry have so that the Government obtains best value?  

8. The TMA contract vehicle has featured two key service areas (Customized Training and Learning Solutions & Customized Human Capital Solutions) for the past thirteen years.  Would industry recommend any reconfiguration of these key service areas?  Should they be combined into one key service area, remain the same or broken out into additional key service areas?  Please provide a rationale for your preference?

9. The prior CHRS solicitation included two key service areas: Customized Training and Learning Solutions & Customized Human Capital Solutions.  The government is contemplating including staff augmentation.  Should staff augmentation fall under the human capital key service area or stand alone?

10. What subject matter, topics and/or fields should be included in the scope of the successor TMA contract vehicle under the two key service areas: Customized Training and Learning Solutions & Customized Human Capital Solutions?

11. What subject matter(s), topic(s) and/or field(s) are not in the current TMA contract vehicle or were left out of the recently cancelled solicitation that should be included in the successor TMA contract vehicle?

12. For large businesses, how would you want the subcontracting plan evaluated?  What are realistic goals per socioeconomic status?

13. Please describe the federal government’s requirements in the training/human capital domain that you believe will either begin to or continue to need customized solutions from your industry.

14. DELETED

15. DELETED

16. DELETED

17. DELETED

18. DELETED

ADDED ON JUNE 18TH, 2014

19. If the Government utilizes the same evaluation methodology employed in the One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services (OASIS) solicitation, what concerns, comments and/or feedback does industry have?  The OASIS solicitation can be found at https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&tab=core&id=9894b0308c....

20. If the Government determines to award an IDIQ and allow Time and Materials (T&M) orders to be issued against it, what would be the impact to both large and small businesses if the IDIQ required contractors to have an approved accounting system, purchasing system and estimating system?

ADDED ON JUNE 20TH, 2014

21. What suggestions and/or ideas does industry have to incorporate sustainable metrics into the acquisition? (This question replaces Questions 14-18)

Comments

KDSYKES

Is there a link or location where Industry can view the individual or collective responses to the Government's questions to date?

cgunville

When I tried to submit responses via the email address provided above (hrfssi@gsa.gov) it was returned as non-deliverable.  Could you provide an alternate address for submission?

 

 

 

Bjorn Miller

cgunville,

The email address hrfssi@gsa.gov was experiencing technical difficulties this morning; however, the issues were resolved and the account is active.  Please resubmit your response.  If further issues arise, please let us know.

 

Bjorn Miller

Contracting Officer

 
Bjorn Miller

PDRI,

I have edited the original post replying to your comment.  Essentially, the Government wants industry to be an active participant throughout the process and we are in the early stages of the acquisition planning phase.  With that said, the next milestone is to draft the preliminary acquisition strategy within the next thirty days; therefore, the Government would like industry to provide feedback and respond to the current and future questions as soon as possible.  Depending on the responses we receive, the Government will act accordingly.

Bjorn Miller

Contracting Officer

PDRI

Could GSA provide a due date or timeframe for their receiving vendor responses to these questions? Thank you.

 

Group Info

Welcome to the Human Capital and Training Solution (HCaTS) community, formerly known as the FSSI HRST community. The intent of this collaborative... More

Stay In The Loop!

To stay informed on the group's latest updates, subscribe here.

Members
707 members

  • Marg
  • Linda-DSFederal
  • champnet